25 C
Tacloban City
April 29, 2025 - Tuesday | 12:15 AM
Home Blog Page 1471

BFAR issues stern warning on eating shellfish amid red tide scare

0

TACLOBAN CITY – The regional office of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) has issued stern warning against consumption of shellfish following recent spate of widespread red tide bloom in Eastern Visayas that has already killed two children. The BFAR-8 said that red tide toxins found on May 27 in Irong-Irong Bay in Tarangnan, Samar and Cambatutay Bay in Catbalogan City have extended to nearby Maqueda Bay, Villareal Bay and Carigara Bay. Maqueda Bay which encompasses the town of Jiabong, Catbalogan City, Motiong, Paranas, Pinabacdao, Hinabangan, San Sebastian, and Calbiga, all in Samar, is a major source of mussel in the region.

The area has been shipping shellfish to Manila for export. BFAR Regional Director Juan Albaladejo said that a family of seven from Barangay Cagutsan, Sierra Island in Catbalogan City was brought to the Samar Provincial Hospital (SPH) and later to the Eastern Visayas Regional Medical Center (EVRMC) after consuming pen shell locally known as “sarad.” An 11-year-old girl from the family died due to paralytic shellfish poisoning on July 17. On July 20, another family from Brgy. San Andres, also in Catbalogan, consumed mussels for dinner bought from a village market. Two of their children were hospitalized after suffering severe stomach pain. The five-year-old boy succumbed at the SPH the same day due to dehydration. As of this week, seven patients are still confined in hospital after eating red tide-infected shellfish. The fisheries bureau asked local government units to assist in the information drive and enforcement of shellfish ban, which strictly prohibits consumption, trading, and transport of shellfish gathered from infested bays.

“It’s unfortunate that these incidents happen despite (our) effort to warn the public starting from the onset of red tide recurrence,” Albaladejo said. “We reiterate our public advisory to refrain from eating, harvesting, marketing, and buying shellfishes from affected bays until such time that the shellfish toxicity level has gone down below the regulatory level,” he added. Fish, squid, shrimp and crab are safe to eat “provided that they are fresh and washed thoroughly and internal organs such as gills and intestines are removed before cooking,” according to BFAR.

In Eastern Samar, BFAR also raised red tide alert over Matarinao Bay after they found toxins from shellfish meat samples gathered from the bay. In its advisory issued late afternoon on July 22, the fisheries bureau disclosed that there are 65 saxitoxins per 100 grams of meat from shellfish gathered in Matarinao Bay. “This is above the regulatory limit because the normal should be below 49 saxitoxins per 100 grams of shellfish meat,” Albaladejo said. Saxitoxin is a principal toxin responsible for a human illness known as paralytic shellfish poisoning. Some shellfish can store this toxin for several weeks and very harmful if consumed by humans. Fish from affected bay are safe for human consumption so long as they are cleaned and washed thoroughly and internal organs are removed before cooking. Matarinao Bay covers the coastal waters of Salcedo, Quinapondan, Hernani, and Gen. MacArthur in Eastern Samar. The bay has been subject to regular monitoring after recurrence of red tide bloom. The last one was in 2013, which lasted for almost a year. In the last quarter of 2015, the region was hit by what the BFAR described as the biggest red tide bloom that has not been seen in more than three decades.  (SARWELL Q. MENIANO/JAZMIN BONIFACIO)

Catbalogan ranks 46 among the country’s most competitive cities

0

CATBALOGAN CITY- The National Competitiveness Council (NCC) has given this city high mark, prompting it to improve its ranking among the country’s component cities.
NCC gave Catbalogan a ranking of 46 covering the 2015 survey using government efficiency, infrastructure and economic dynamism as indices.
Catbalogan, whose cityhood was attained in 2009, was in the category of component cities.
The 2015 ranking was far higher compared to the 104 position it garnered on the 2014 NCC survey.
Mayor Stephany Uy-Tan personally received the award on July 14, 2016 during the 4th Regional Competitiveness Summit held at the Philippine International Convention Center.
“I am elated by the latest result. Our big jump from 104th to 46th spot out of hundreds of components cities in our nation serves as a vindication for the hard work of our employees, the cooperation of various agencies in the city and the support of the people of Catbalogan. This is no less than what we expected,” she said.
The city mayor added that she shares the recognition to all their development partners who had assisted them in all of their endeavors.
“It is through their generous inputs that we were able to improve our programs and services,” Uy-Tan said.
The city mayor appealed to her constituents and their development partners to continue helping the city government by working together to achieve their goal to make Catbalogan one of the most truly progressive cities in the country.
“Let it not be a cause for us to be complacent. If anything, let this victory further remind us how much we can achieve if we will be united. Let us therefor work together for the attainment of the much higher goal – the top spot,” she said. (ROEL T. AMAZONA)

DZR porter receives commendation from the Tacloban officials

0

TACLOBAN CITY- For returning a sizeable sum of money, the Sangguniang Panlungsod of this city is to commend Ricardo Moreno’s commendable act. On July 17, Moreno, who has been working as a porter at the Daniel Z. Romualdez (DZR) Airport for 21 years, found a box at the conveyor section of the airport containing P21,000, chocolates and personal belongings of the owner. The honest porter did not think twice in keeping the cash to himself as he surrendered it to the airport’s security immediately. On Wednesday (July 27), in giving tribute to his honesty, Moreno will receive a commendation from the members of the city council. Vice Mayor Jerry “Sambo” Yaokasin, presiding officer of the council, said that it is just proper to give credit to the instant celebrity. As he extolled the good deed of Moreno, the vice mayor also asked other airport porters to also be as honest as Moreno whom he described as his favorite porter wherever he arrives at the DZR Airport.  An employee of the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP), which manages the DZR Airport, posted the video of Moreno which went viral. As of last count, the video was shared and liked by more than 3,000 netizens. It was learned that Moreno, previous instances, has also returned lost items to the airport security. (LIZBETH ANN A. ABELLA)

FOI

0

seal
MALACAÑAN PALACE
MANILA

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO.

OPERATIONALIZING IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PEOPLE’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND THE STATE POLICIES OF FULL PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AND TRANSPARENCY IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE AND PROVIDING GUIDELINES THEREFOR

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 28, Article II of the 1987 Constitution, the State adopts and implements a policy of full public disclosure of all its transactions involving public interest, subject to reasonable conditions prescribed by law;
WHEREAS, Section 7, Article III of the Constitution guarantees the right of the people to information on matters of public concern;
WHEREAS, the incorporation of this right in the Constitution is a recognition of the fundamental role of free and open exchange of information in a democracy, meant to enhance transparency and accountability in government official acts, transactions, or decisions;
WHEREAS, the Executive Branch recognizes the urgent need to operationalize these Constitution provisions;
WHEREAS, the President, under Section 17, Article VII of the Constitution, has control over all executive departments, bureaus and offices, and the duty to ensure that the laws be faithfully executed;
WHEREAS, the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (R.A. 10173), including its implementing Rules and Regulations, strengthens the fundamental human right of privacy, and of communication while ensuring the free flow of information to promote innovation and growth;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, RODRIGO ROA DUTERTE, President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by the COnstitution and existing laws, do hereby order;
section 1. Definition. For the purpose of this Executive Order, the following terms shall mean:

(a) “Information” shall mean any records, documents, papers, reports, letters, contracts, minutes and transcripts of official meetings, maps, books, photographs, data, research materials, films, sound and video recording, magnetic or other tapes, electronic data, computer stored data, or any other like or similar data or materials recorded, stored or archived in whatever format, whether offline or online, which are made, received, or kept in or under the control and custody of any government office pursuant to law, executive order, and rules and regulations or in connection with the performance or transaction of official business by any government office.

(b) “Official record/records” shall refer to information produced or received by a public officer or employee, or by a government office in an official capacity or pursuant to a public function or duty.

(c) “Public record/records” shall include information required by laws, executive orders, rules or regulations to be entered, kept and made publicly available by a government office.

SECTION 2. Coverage. This order shall cover all government offices under the Executive Branch, including but not limited to the national government and all its offices, departments, bureaus, offices, and instrumentalities, including government-owned or -controlled corporations, and state universities and colleges. Local government units (LGUs) are encouraged to observe and be guided by this Order.
SECTION 3. Access to Information. Every Filipino shall have access to information, official records, public records and to documents and paper pertaining to official acts, transactions or decisions, as well as to government research data used as basis for public-development.
SECTION 4. Exception. Access to information shall be denied when the information falls under any of the exceptions enshrined in the Constitution, existing law or jurisprudence.

The Department of Justice and the Office of the Solicitor GEneral are hereby directed to prepare an inventory of such exceptions and submit the same to the office of the President within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of effectivity of this Order.
The Office of the President shall thereafter, immediately circularize the inventory of exceptions for the guidance of all government offices and instrumentalities covered by this Order and the general public.

Said inventory of exceptions shall periodically be updated to properly reflect any change in existing law and jurisprudence and the Department of Justice and the Office of the Solicitor General are directed to update the inventory of exceptions as the need to do so arises, for circularization as hereinabove stated.

SECTION 5. Availability of SALN. Subject to the provisions contained in Sections 3 and 4 of this Order, all public officials are reminded of their obligation to file and make available for scrutiny, their Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth in accordance with existing laws, rules and regulations, and the spirit and letter of this Order.
SECTION 6. Application and Interpretation. There shall be a legal presumption in favor of access to information, public records and official records. No request for information shall be denied unless it clearly fals under any of the exceptions listed in the inventory or updated inventory of exceptions circularized by the Office of the President as provided in the preceding section.

The determination of the applicability of any of the exceptions to the request shall be the responsibility of the Head of the Office which is in custody or control of the information, public record or official record, or of the responsible central or field officer duly designatd by him in writing.
In making such determination, the Head of the Office or his designated officer shall exercise reasonable diligence to ensure that no exception shall be used or availed of to deny any request for information or access to public records, or official records if the denial is intended primarily and purposely to cover up a crime, wrongdoing, graft and corruption.

SECTION 7. Protection of Privacy. While providing access to information, public records, and official records, responsibile officials shall afford full protection to the right to privacy of the individual as follows:

(a) Each government office per Section 2 hereof shall ensure that personal information in its custody or under its control is disclosed or released only if it is material or relevant to the subject-matter of the request and its disclosure is permissible under this order or existing law, rules or regulations;

(b) Each government office must protect personal information in its custody or control by making reasonable security arrangements against leaks or premature disclosure of personal information which unduly exposes the individual whose personal information is requested, to virification, harassment or any other wrongful acts; and

(c) Any employee, official or director of a government office per Section 2 hereof who has access, authorized or unauthorized, to personal information in the custody of the office, must not disclose that information except when authorized under this order or pursuant to existing laws, rules or regulation.

SECTION 8. People’s Freedom to Information (FOI) Manual. For the effective implementation of this Order, every government office is directed to prepare within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the effectivity of this Order, its own People’s FOI Manual, which shall include among others the following provisions:
(a) The location and contact information of the head, regional, provincial, and field offices, and other established places where the public can obtain information or submit requests;

(b) The person or office responsible for recieving requests for information;
(c) The procedure for the filing and processing of the request as specified in the succeding section 9 of this Order;
(d) The standard forms for the submission of requests and for the proper acknowledgment of requests;
(e) The process for the disposition of requests;
(f) The procedure for the administrative appeal of any denial for access to information; and
(g) The schedule of applicable fees.

SECTION 9. Procedure. The following procedure shall govern the filing and processing of request for access to information:
(a) Any person who requests access to information shall submit a written request to the government office concerned. The request shall state the name and contact information of the requesting party, provide valid proof of his identification or authorization, reasonably describe the information requested, and the reason for, or purpose of, the request for information: Provided, that no request shall be denied or refused acceptance unless the reason for the request is contrary to law, existing rules and regulations or it is one of the exceptions contained in the inventory or updated inventory of exception as hereinabove provided.

(b) The public official receiving the request shall provide reasonable assistance, free of charge, to enable all requesting parties and particularly those with special needs, to comply with the request requirements under this Section.

(c) The request shall be stamped by the government office, indicating the date and time of receipt and the names, rank, title and position of the receiving public officer or employee with the corresponding signature, and a copy thereof furnished to the requesting party. Each government office shall establish a system to trace the status of all requests for information received by it.

(d) The government office shall respond to a request fully compliant with requirements of sub-section (a) hereof as soon as practicable but not exceeding fifteen (15) working days from the receipt thereof. The response mentioned above refers to the decision of the office or office concerned to grant or deny access to the information requested.

(e) The period to respond may be extended whenever the information requested requires extensive search of the government office’s records facilities, examination of voluminous records, the occurrence of fortuitous events or other analogous cases. The government office shall notify the person making the request of the extension, setting forth the reasons for such extension. In no case shall the extension go beyond twenty (20) working days unless exceptional circumstances warrant a longer period.
(f) Once a decision is made to grant the request, the person making the request shall be notified of such decision and directed to pay any applicable fees.

SECTION 10. Fees. Government offices shall not charge any fee for accepting requests for access to information. They may, however, charge a reasonable fee to reimburse necessary costs, including actual costs of reproduction and copying of the information requested, subject to existing rules and regulations. In no case shall the applicable fees be so onerous as to defeat the purpose of this Order.

SECTION 11. Identical or Substantially Similar Requests. The government office shall not be required to act upon an unreasonable subsequent identical or substantially similar request from the same requesting party whose request has already been previously granted or denied by the same government office.

SECTION 12. Notice to Denial. If the government office decides to deny the request, in whole or in part, it shall as soon as practicable, and in any case within fifteen (15) working days from the receipt of the request, notify the requesting party the denial in writing. The notice shall clearly set forth the ground or grounds for denial and the circumstances on which the denial is based. Failure to notify the requesting party of the action taken on the request within the period herein stipulated shall be deemed a denial of the request for access to information.

SECTION 13. Remedies in Cases of Denial of Request for Access to Information.

(a) Denial of any request for access to information may be appealed to the person or office next higher in the authority, following the procedure mentioned in Section 8 (f) of this Order: Provided, that the written appeal must be filed by the same person making the request within fifteen (15) celandar days from the notice of denial or from the lapse of the relevant period to respond to the request.

(b) The appeal shall be decided by the person or office next higher in authority within thirty (30) working days from the filing of said written appeal. Failure of such person or office to decide within the afore-stated period shall be deemed a denial of the appeal.

(c) Upon exhaustion of administrative appeal remedies, the requesting party may file the appropriate case in the proper courts in accordance with the Rules of Court.

SECTION 14. Keeping of Records. Subject to existing laws, rules and regulations, government offices shall create and/or maintain accurate and reasonably complete records of important information in appropriate formats, and implement a records management system that facilitates easy identification, retrieval and communication of information to the public.

SECTION 15. Administrative Liability. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Order may be a ground for administrative and disciplinary sanctions against any erring public officer or employee as provided under existing laws or regulations.

SECTION 16. Implementing Details. All government offices in the Executive Branch are directed to formulate their respective implementing details taking into consideration their mandates and the nature of information in their custody or control, within one hundred twenty (120) days from the effectivity of this Order.
SECTION 17. Separability Clause. If any section or part of this Order is held unconstitutional or invalid, the other sections or provisions not otherwise affected shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 18. Repealing Clause. All orders, rules and regulations, issuances or any part thereof inconsistent with the provisions of this Executive Order are hereby repealed, amended or modified accordingly: Provided, that the provisions of Memorandum Circular No. 78 (s. 1964), as amended, shall not be deemed repealed pending further review.

SECTION 19. Effectivity. This Order shall take effect immediately upon publication in a newspaper of general circulation.
Done, in the City of Manila, this day of in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Sixteen.

By the President: sign

SALVADOR C. MEDIALDEA
Executive Secretary

Gov’t pays P22-M crop insurance to Eastern Visayas farmers

0

TACLOBAN CITY – The Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation (PCIC) has already released P22.2 million indemnity claims to 4,435 farmers in the region this year. Most of the recipients are farmers who suffered losses due to pest infestation, diseases, and dry spell affecting rice, corn, and high value crops production. These farmers who received the claims from January 1 to July 18 are the Registry System for Basic Sector in Agriculture (RSBSA) program with premiums sponsored by the Department of Agriculture (DA) and local government units (LGUs). “Although the drought slightly hit some parts of the region, majority of claims are caused by damages brought by pest and disease infestation,” said PCIC Regional Manager Dominico Digamon. Last year, the PCIC paid more indemnity at P30 million during the first semester. The higher amount is largely contributed to increase in the number of farms covered with insurance due to free premiums after disaster. “We are still hoping to surpass our performance last year with the commitment of support from the DA and LGUs.Also, farmers now are more aware of the impacts of disaster and the need for crop insurance,” Digamon said. A farmer pays P890 for every single hectare covered. Once damaged, they will get up to P10,000 indemnity. The government’s crop indemnity program provides insurance protection to agricultural producers against loss of the crops on the account of natural calamities, plant pests and disease, and other perils.
Rice remains the major program but PCIC also covers corn, high value commercial crops, livestock, fisheries, non-crop farm products, term insurance power program, and death benefits for those with insured rice and corn farms.
(SARWELL Q. MENIANO)

Piñol to detail LGU-Extension Workers to DA

0

TACLOBAN CITY- Department of Agriculture Secretary Manny F. Piñol in his official visit to Eastern Visayas has expressed his intention to bring back to DA’s supervision all agricultural extension workers (AEWs) who were devolved to local government units due to the enactment and implementation of the Local Government Code of 1992.
“This is an anomaly,” Secretary Piñol said in an agri- stakeholders’ forum held recently at Hotel de Francisco in Catbalogan City, Samar as part of his “Biyaheng Bukid initiative” since his appointment as the Agri Chief by President Rody Duterte.

He said he had discussed this matter with DILG Secretary Mike Sueño on the possibility of having agricultural extension workers detailed at DA so the agency can answer for the cost of their travelling expenses to far flung barangays, even providing them with gasoline allowance for their vehicles. The DILG head was amenable to the idea, Piñol said, adding that he will also talk about this matter with concerned local government units and consequently craft a memorandum of agreement for this purpose.

Three governors, namely: Gov. Sharee Ann Tan of Samar, Gov. Jose Ong of Northern Samar and Gov. Leopoldo Dominico Petilla of Leyte who were with Sec. Piñol during the dialogue aptly dubbed as “Aragtubang: Gobyerno ug Mulopyo (face-to-face: government and people) appeared to be amenable to the idea. According to Piñol he had toyed the idea of having field workers detailed at DA due to common observations that these workers are often seen in high heels and just staying at the office when they are supposed to be in the field.

During the forum he disclosed a massive plan to transform the entire Samar Island into a major food basket due to its seemingly vast array of untapped agricultural lands.
At the press conference which followed after the dialogue, Piñol said that “palalagu-in natin ang Samar until it turns into a food basket”. A project management team will be organized to be composed of DA-Regional Staff and the LGU-based extension workers. Accordingly, these extension workers, once detailed at DA and empowered with travel incentives, will be the focal persons to monitor progress of agriculture projects in their localities, and the measure of success will be to alleviate poverty of marginal farmers in two or three years’ time. The Municipal/City Agriculture Officers (MAOs) attending the stakeholders’ forum with the governors, district and party-list representatives, and the local farmer-leaders applauded on hearing Piñol’s elaborate plan to detail field workers to DA.

Practically, this has long been the common clamor of the devolved agricultural workers ever since the Local Government Code has been enforced. However, due to seeming lack of political will and other related reasons, the previous plans to bring them back to DA’s fold has been stalled. With this latest pronouncement and affirmation from the new DA Secretary, many are optimistic that sooner, Secretary Piñol will make good on his promise. (PR)

Recent Posts

DALMACIO C. GRAFIL
PUBLISHER

ALMA GRAFIL
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

ROMEO CEBREROS
OFFICE IN-CHARGE

OFFICE
BRGY. SONGCO, BORONGAN CITY

CONTACT NUMBERS
(055) 261 – 3319 | 0955 251 1533 | 0917 771 0320 | 0915 897 7439 | 0921 511 0010

DALMACIO C. GRAFIL
PUBLISHER

RICKY J. BAUTISTA
EDITOR

ALMA GRAFIL
BUS. MANAGER

OFFICE
RIZAL AVENUE, CATBALOGAN
(INFRONT OF FIRE DEPARTMENT, NEAR CITY HALL)

CONTACT NUMBERS
0917 771 0320 | 0915 897 7439 | 0921 511 0010

EMAIL
lsdaily2@yahoo.com

WEBSITE
www.issuu.com/samarweeklyexpress