This has become a common tale: a newly finished road gave way just months after its inauguration. Cracks had formed like veins across its surface, and soon, a portion collapsed entirely. If this is not a tragic insult to public infrastructure, then what is?

This is not an isolated case. Across provinces and cities, from Northern Luzon to far-flung barangays in Mindanao, one can spot bridges that look like they’re in their final stages of life just months after ribbon-cutting. Drainage systems get clogged with the first rain. Farm-to-market roads are barely passable even on sunny days. All these reveal the same thing: a rotten system that tolerates, and in many cases enables, poor workmanship, the use of substandard materials, and the utter disregard for engineering standards. Government infrastructure, meant to last decades, barely survives a season, and the people, as always, are left to suffer the consequences.

It’s hard not to see the correlation between this kind of decay and the kind of people involved in building them. Contractors win bids not necessarily because they are capable, but because they have connections or know how to play the game. In turn, they cut corners—sand is mixed with more sand, cement is thinned out, steel is downgraded, and laborers are underpaid. The final output is never the structure proposed in the plan. It’s a compromise—an illusion—camouflaged with a fresh coat of paint or a well-placed signboard bearing a politician’s name.

The engineers who ought to safeguard standards often turn a blind eye, as if silence were part of their job description. Some are powerless, others complicit. Inspections become mere formalities. Instead of being the last line of defense against faulty construction, they become enablers of it. It’s as if the entire infrastructure chain—from planning to execution—has been infected by a culture of settling for “pwede na ’yan.” And when mediocrity becomes the standard, collapse is just a matter of time.

Of course, nobody gets jailed when a barangay bridge collapses. No headlines scream for accountability when a newly built seawall crumbles after the first typhoon. Blame is passed around like a hot potato, and then it dies in the pit of bureaucracy. What remains is the crater in the road, the broken slab of concrete, and the danger it poses to every passerby. Meanwhile, the budgets have been released, the commissions pocketed, and the paper trail meticulously sanitized. It’s public funds turned into private gain, written in the language of cracked pavement and rusty reinforcements.

There’s something particularly cruel in the way bad infrastructure harms the poor. They have no choice but to use it every day. Students cross unstable footbridges to attend classes. Farmers must push their carabaos through muddy, barely graveled roads to bring crops to town. Ambulances get delayed by potholes or unfinished highways. Yet it is their taxes, no matter how small, that partly paid for these failures. And it is their votes that gave the officials their power. Ironically, those in government vehicles, cushioned by tinted SUVs and armed with sirens, are least affected by these failures.

But what’s even worse is that this system breeds hopelessness. People stop expecting better. They stop complaining. “Ganyan na talaga ’yan,” they say. It’s a kind of national fatigue—a numbness to institutional failure. And in that numbness lies our greatest tragedy: we stop demanding accountability because we’ve learned not to expect it. Corruption thrives best not in outrage, but in apathy. And when everyone shrugs off a bridge collapse as ordinary, then maybe the collapse we should fear most is not structural, but moral.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Government projects need honest execution. Technical plans must be followed like sacred contracts. Procurement processes should reward competence, not connections. Most of all, those tasked with overseeing public works must be made to walk on the roads they build, use the facilities they fund, and live with the consequences of their choices. Only then might they start building not just with cement and steel, but with conscience.

WHILE logic will always have an important role to play in our life, we should also realize that logic alone cannot cope with all the realities that we have to deal with in our life. Our logic can only work within the natural plane and our human level. It can hardly manage to take on realities that are spiritual and supernatural, let alone, divine wisdom which in the end should always guide us.

How can human logic, for example, understand such Christian teachings as to love our enemies, to die in order to live, to be the last in order to be the first, the master has to be first a servant, a virgin giving birth, etc.? That’s when our logic would just be kaput.
To be guided by human logic alone unavoidably would lead us to be judgmental and self-righteous. This was what happened to some of the leading Jews during Christ’s time. Lacking in humility, their faith was undermined and they ended up not only misjudging Christ but also crucifying him.

We have to be humble enough to acknowledge that our logic-certainties can never cope with the mysteries of life. No matter how objective and scientific these certainties are derived, no matter how deep and exhaustive our philosophies, theologies and ideologies are made, our certainties just cannot take all the mysteries in our life.

Even in the world of nature where in theory we have the capacity to know things conclusively, we often find ourselves in situations of tentativeness and even of outright error. That is why we are always in the process of discoveries and we would not know when we can end it, that is to say, when we can say that we have known everything to be known in the world of nature.

This does not mean that our certainties can never know the truth, even the absolute, and not just relative, truths. Yes, we can, but the best that we can do is to project ourselves to infinite possibilities, because even the absolute truths are not things that are frozen. They are always dynamic.

Our logical certainties can only tackle some aspects and levels of the reality that is proper to us. We need to realize more deeply that we have to contend not only with natural and even spiritual realities but also with supernatural realities that simply are above our nature to know, unless some revelation is made which should be corresponded to with our act of belief.

Indeed, we have to be truly humble to acknowledge this fact of life and behave accordingly. While we can know some aspects of the truth, we can never say that we know everything. Not even our mathematical precision and scientific accuracy can warrant us to claim that we know everything.

That is why we need to be most careful with our judgments. We have to judge fairly, that is, with love of God and neighbor as the main motive for judging. From the Book of Leviticus, we read: “You shall not act dishonestly in rendering judgment. Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.” (19,15)

If we have love for God and neighbor as the main motive for judging, we would know what to say, how to say it, and when to say it. And somehow, we can manage to judge all things, just as St. Paul once said: “He that is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.” (1 Cor 2,15)

Are you feeling the heat? Well, everybody is feeling the humid dry reality of Eastern Visayas! In fact, if Eastern Visayas is a brand of a beer we are the Eastern Visayas Super Dry!

As of early July 2025, Tacloban and much of Eastern Visayas have been experiencing a stretch of warm and humid weather with little to no rainfall. While exact data on the number of consecutive dry days isn’t publicly specified, forecasts and reports suggest that this dry spell has lasted several days to possibly over a week, with only isolated rain showers or localized thunderstorms occurring sporadically.

Primary reason for the dry conditions is a monsoon break—a temporary pause in the southwest monsoon (habagat), which typically brings rain to the region during this season. We have to take a closer look on what we are feeling, with the persistent heat. Here are some reasons;

Monsoon Break: The southwest monsoon is currently affecting only extreme northern Luzon, leaving Eastern Visayas with reduced moisture and rainfall.

Localized Thunderstorms: While these can still occur, they’re scattered and not enough to break the dry spell.

Low-Pressure Area (LPA): A weather disturbance was spotted east of Eastern Visayas, but it remains outside the Philippine Area of Responsibility and has a low chance of developing into a cyclone.

Seasonal Climate Patterns: Tacloban typically sees fewer rainy days in April and May, but August is usually wetter—so this dry spell is somewhat unusual for this time of year.
What can we do? To mitigate the heat and lack of rains?

1. Conserve Water

Limit usage: Use water wisely—shorten showers, fix leaks, and avoid unnecessary washing.
Reuse when possible: Collect water from laundry or dishwashing for cleaning floors or watering plants.

Store clean water: Keep emergency reserves in case of supply interruptions.

2. Protect Plants and Crops

Water early or late: Water gardens or crops during cooler hours to reduce evaporation.
Mulch soil: Use dried leaves or straw to retain moisture in the soil.

Shade sensitive plants: Use netting or temporary covers to reduce heat stress.

3. Stay Cool and Healthy

Hydrate often: Drink water regularly, even if you’re not thirsty.
Wear light clothing: Choose breathable fabrics like cotton.

Avoid peak heat: Stay indoors or in shaded areas between 10 AM and 3 PM.

4. Prevent Fire Hazards

Avoid open burning: Dry vegetation increases fire risk.

Clear surroundings: Remove dry leaves and debris near homes and farms.
Report smoke: Alert local authorities if you see signs of fire.

Lets pray for rain but lets also do things that will allow us to survive, the long super-dry spell!

Dragging purposely from performing its constitutional mandate to conduct the impeachment trial of the former education secretary and now impeached vice president, the senate president and exposed the senator-judges into their personal biases. Without reservation, senators who are loyal to the former and now detained president had shamelessly acted as defense lawyers of the impeached vice president notwithstanding that they are not lawyers. Such acts are clearly unlawful exercise of the legal profession. In other professions which require formal education and the passing of licensure examinations, any person performing acts without the required license is engaging in malpractice of profession.

In the deliberations on the senate floor, senator Ronald “Bato” Marapon dela Rosa and senator Christopher Lawrence “Bong” Teroso Go had openly shown their blind loyalty to the former education secretary and now impeached vice president Sara Z. Duterte. Obtaining the floor to raise a motion, he moved for the dismissal of the impeachment complaint even before the senate could hear the merits of the articles of impeachment. He explained that the articles of impeachment violated the one-year bar rule which prohibits the filing of more than one articles of impeachment within one year. That motion was duly seconded forthright by senator Christopher Lawrence Teroso Go.

The seemingly lengthy discussion by the movant was interrupted by a privilege motion from opposition senator Ana Theresia “Risa” Navarro Hontiveros-Baraquel who raised the issue of convening the impeachment court first before entertaining any matter, chiefly the motion to dismiss. Discussions ensued as the movant insisted on his motion which had been duly seconded. But the opposing view remain that the said motion could not be resolved unless the impeachment court is convened and the senator-judges take their oath.
The deliberation went without any clear direction as the presiding officer in senate president Francis Joseph “Chiz´ Guevara Escudero recognized Maria Josefa Remedios “Imee” Marcos-Manotoc who raised a privilege motion while senator Risa Hontiveros as the floor. It interrupted the discussion of senator Risa Hontiveros as the privileged motion takes precedence over any floor deliberation.

On the other hand, senator Robinhood Ferdinand “Robin” Cariño Padilla obtained the floor to express his personal sentiment that the articles of impeachment must be dismissed for it is causing division among our people. He lamented that the impeachment is causing embarrassment as there are many important issues that the country needs than the impeachment of the former education secretary and now impeached vice president. Such proposition raises the question as to what is embarrassing, the irregularities allegedly committed by the former education secretary and now impeached vice president or the action to hold accountability by way of impeachment, In the end, the actuations of senator-judges loyal to the Duterte family is clear signs of prejudice.
comments to alellema@yahoo.com