In the continuing congressional investigation on the Philippine Offshore Gaming Operations (POGO) that had proliferated in various localities, mainly in Bamban, Pampanga where the suspended mayor Alice Guo reigned since 2022 to 2024. She was dismissed by the Office of the Ombudsman for grave misconduct. In an order dated 12 August 2024, the Office of the Ombudsman also forfeited the suspended mayor’s retirement benefits and perpetual disqualification from holding public office. It explained that the suspended mayor’s involvement in operations of raided POGO in her area of jurisdiction showed a willful intent on her part to violate the law or disregard established rules.
It found the series of acts to be interconnected, leading to the conclusion that they were committed with ulterior motive. There too is a quo warranto case that government lawyers filed and are pursuing. That case will proceed considering that the dismissed mayor may appeal the dismissal order issued by the Office of the Ombudsman. If the quo warranto petition will succeed, it will make Guo Hua Ping a.k.a. Alice Guo ineligible to run for any elective public office in the future. Meanwhile, the Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Commission (PAOCC) lauded the Office of the Ombudsman for its decision to dismiss mayor Alice Guo.
The election of dismissed mayor Alice Guo had been the subject of an action from the election commission which is seeking the cancellation of her certificate of candidacy as her citizenship had been found dubious. If the action will succeed, the dismissed mayor will face possible administrative and criminal cases. It will also reinforce the order issued by the Office of the Ombudsman dismissing her from office and disqualifying her from holding any elective public office in the future. Such order would result in her ineligibility to hold any appointive position in the government.
Other government officials who were in cahoots with the dismissed mayor Alice Guo were also ordered dismissed for their participation in the offenses that the dismissed mayor was found guilty of. These developments bring gloom on the other government officials who cooperated with the dismissed mayor, mainly those who facilitated in the construction of the buildings that were found to have housed POGO operations.
Indeed, what started as a simple query on the identity of the dismissed mayor opened a proverbial pandora’s box that led to multifarious issues. The illegal entry of foreigners, mostly Chinese who were found to be involved in criminal activities. The quad show is bound to proceed and hog the limelight until the forthcoming elections,
comments to alellema@yahoo.com
Lawmakers, listen up!
As I look around at the vast stretches of idle farmland in the countryside, I can’t help but feel frustrated at the sheer waste of potential. These lands, which could be teeming with crops and providing for communities, remain barren and unused. It seems to me that land ownership, especially agricultural land, should come with a responsibility to the greater good. It’s not enough to simply own land and let it sit idle. If we are serious about addressing food security and poverty, we need to make it mandatory for landowners to put their farmlands to productive use.
I strongly believe that we should pass laws that penalize landowners who fail to cultivate their agricultural lands. Farmland is a precious resource that, in the right hands, could yield crops that feed the nation. I’ve seen too many cases where landowners simply let their properties lie dormant, either because they’re too lazy or because they see it as a future real estate investment rather than a source of agricultural produce. This kind of mindset is not just irresponsible—it’s harmful to our society as a whole. These lands should be cultivated for the benefit of everyone, not just hoarded for profit.
The way I see it, if a landowner refuses or is unable to make their land productive, then they should be required to give it up to someone who can. I’m not talking about outright land grabs or unfair seizures, but rather a legal mechanism that ensures that fertile land doesn’t go to waste. There are many farmers and agrarian communities out there who are more than willing to cultivate these lands if only they had access. We need to create a system where those who are willing and able to farm can do so, even if it means redistributing unproductive land.
For me, it’s not just about penalizing landowners for their negligence, but also about incentivizing productivity. If a landowner can’t meet certain benchmarks for agricultural output, then they should be allowed to lease or sell their land to someone who can. This way, there’s a clear path toward making sure our agricultural lands are being put to good use. It’s only fair that if someone is unable to contribute to the country’s agricultural needs, they should let go of their hold on that land.
The idea of letting unproductive land sit idle while people go hungry infuriates me. Our country’s food production should be one of our top priorities, and there’s no excuse for landowners to let their fields remain empty. To me, it feels almost criminal for someone to own fertile land and yet do nothing with it. They should be penalized heavily for such negligence, especially when so many hardworking farmers are struggling with land access.
If landowners can’t or won’t make the land yield, then they simply don’t deserve to keep it.
I also believe that by passing laws to enforce agricultural productivity, we would address some of the inequities in land distribution. Many of these idle lands are owned by a wealthy few who have the luxury of sitting on their property without feeling the urgency to cultivate it. Meanwhile, farmers who would love to work the land are forced to labor on small plots or even leave agriculture altogether. By redistributing idle lands to those willing to farm them, we could create a more just and equitable agricultural system.
This isn’t just about food production, either. It’s about creating jobs, boosting local economies, and preserving the rural way of life. If we put these farmlands back into productive use, we would generate employment for countless individuals in rural communities. I believe that this is the kind of progress we need—progress that isn’t just about increasing yields but about lifting people out of poverty and ensuring that our land benefits everyone.
I feel that we have a responsibility to ensure that agricultural lands are put to good use. By making it mandatory for landowners to cultivate their farmlands, and by penalizing those who don’t, we can help address food insecurity, poverty, and inequality. Let’s pass these laws and ensure that our fertile lands serve the people, not the profits of a few.