TACLOBAN CITY – Tingog party-list Representative Jude Acidre has expressed opposition to the proposed division of Leyte into two provinces, aligning with the stance of most local officials, including Leyte Governor Carlos Jericho ‘Icot’ Petilla.
In a press conference, Acidre addressed House Bill 11077, filed by Leyte 4th District Representative Richard Gomez, stating his support for the governor’s position against the measure.
He criticized the lack of consultation with key stakeholders, including local officials and legislators.
“This should not have been done hastily, filing the bill without consulting Eastern Visayas congressmen, the Speaker, or even our governor,” Acidre said.
“I think issues like this should be treated objectively, and that includes rigorous and open consultation not just those in western Leyte but also those in eastern Leyte, as everyone will vote in a plebiscite,” the lawmaker added.
Several municipal councils, including those of Palompon, Burauen, Matag-ob, and Isabel, have issued resolutions opposing the proposed bill, which the Leyte provincial board has forwarded to the House of Representatives.
The League of Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP) – Leyte Chapter also passed a resolution opposing the division, citing the additional government funding required to establish new offices and hire personnel.
Under House Bill 11077, Leyte would be divided into two provinces based on language and geography.
The proposed Western Leyte province would encompass the third and fourth districts, along with two municipalities from the fifth district, Javier and Abuyog. The remaining areas would constitute the existing Leyte province.
Proposed Western Leyte province (Bisaya-speaking areas include Matalom, Bato, Hilongos, Inopacan, Baybay City, Albuera, Ormoc City, Kananga, Matag-ob, Merida, Isabel, Palompon, Villaba, Tabango, San Isidro, Calubian, Mahaplag, and Leyte town.
Remaining Leyte province or those speaking Waray include Capoocan, Carigara, Barugo, Jaro, Alangalang, San Miguel, Babatngon, Sta. Fe, Pastrana, Dagami, Palo, Tabontabon, Tanauan, Tunga, Tolosa, Dulag, Julita, La Paz, Mayorga, MacArthur, Burauen, and Tacloban City.
Critics of the proposal argue that the timing is not ideal for such a division, as it would entail significant administrative and financial costs while potentially creating unnecessary political and logistical challenges. (ROEL T. AMAZONA)
